Yokohama Geolandar X AT vs Bfg KO2

Tire longevity is a big deal—it’s about how many miles you can clock before the tread wears thin. The BFGoodrich KO2 offers a straightforward 50,000-mile limited treadwear warranty across all sizes, a reassuring nod to its durability.

Whether you’re hauling gear or just commuting, that consistency is a strong selling point. Meanwhile, the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT takes a tiered approach: 50,000 miles for Euro-metric sizes (typically lighter-duty applications) and 45,000 miles for LT-metric sizes (built for heavier loads).

That 5,000-mile gap might not sound like much, but for those running LT sizes on a beefy truck, it could mean an earlier trip to the tire shop. If you value a uniform warranty and plan to rack up miles, the KO2 has a slight edge here.

Tire Price

Let’s talk money—because tires aren’t cheap, and your wallet deserves a say. Based on estimates for a common size like 285/70R17, the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT rings in at around $250 per tire, while the BFGoodrich KO2 sits closer to $300.

That $50 difference per tire adds up fast, especially if you’re outfitting a full set. The X-AT’s lower price tag makes it an attractive option for budget-minded drivers who still want solid all-terrain performance.

The KO2, however, commands a premium, likely tied to its reputation and proven track record. If you’re pinching pennies but still need a capable tire, the X-AT beckons; if you’re willing to invest a bit more for peace of mind, the KO2 justifies its cost.

Tire Type

Both the X-AT and KO2 fall squarely in the all-terrain camp, meaning they’re engineered to tackle everything from asphalt to dirt trails.

They’re the Swiss Army knives of tires—versatile enough to keep you rolling without swapping sets for every season or terrain.

This shared DNA makes them ideal for drivers who want one tire to do it all, whether it’s a daily commute or an off-road detour.

No surprises here: both are designed with SUVs and trucks in mind, promising grip in mud, sand, and even light snow. The real differences lie in how they execute that versatility, which we’ll unpack next.

Rim Diameter Range

Fitment flexibility is a practical concern—will these tires work with your wheels? Fortunately, both the Yokohama X-AT and BFGoodrich KO2 cover a broad spectrum, available for rim diameters from 15 to 22 inches.

Whether you’re rolling on a compact SUV with smaller rims or a lifted truck with massive hoops, you’ll find sizes to match.

This wide range ensures neither tire limits your vehicle choice, making them equally adaptable for a variety of setups. It’s a tie in this category—your rim size won’t be the deciding factor.

Tread Pattern

Tread design is where tires reveal their personality, and these two don’t disappoint. The BFGoodrich KO2 sports an aggressive pattern with interlocking tread blocks and locking 3-D sipes—tiny slits that enhance grip on slippery surfaces.

This setup excels at biting into loose terrain, from mud to snow, and its beefy sidewalls shrug off rocks and debris. The Yokohama Geolandar X-AT counters with a staggered five-block pitch sequence and zig-zag grooves, paired with an elliptical contact patch for even wear.

Its design aims to balance traction with reduced road noise, a nod to on-road comfort. While both patterns scream capability, the KO2’s siping gives it a slight advantage in maintaining traction on tricky surfaces, whereas the X-AT prioritizes a quieter ride.

Off-Road Performance

For off-road enthusiasts, this is the meat of the matter. The BFGoodrich KO2 has a cult following—and for good reason. Its advanced siping and reinforced sidewalls shine in mud, snow, and rocky terrain, earning rave reviews from drivers who push their rigs to the limit.

Users report it handles deep slop and icy patches with confidence, making it a go-to for serious trailblazers. The Yokohama Geolandar X-AT holds its own, excelling on rocks and sand, but some note it can pack mud in wet conditions, requiring a bit more finesse to clear.

It’s not a slouch by any means—35,000-mile reviews praise its durability off-road—but the KO2’s edge in extreme scenarios is hard to ignore. If trails are your playground, the KO2 might just be your MVP.

On-Road Performance: Everyday Ease

Not every drive is an off-road odyssey—sometimes it’s just the highway to work. Here, the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT takes the lead with a smoother, quieter ride.

Its tread design minimizes noise, and drivers often highlight its comfort on pavement, making it a strong pick for mixed-use drivers who log more miles on-road.

The BFGoodrich KO2, while perfectly competent on highways, tends to hum a bit louder due to its aggressive tread.

It’s not unbearable, but it’s less refined than the X-AT in this arena. For those who value a peaceful commute over occasional off-road jaunts, the X-AT delivers a more polished experience.

Expert Opinion

The tire world loves a good debate, and experts have weighed in. The BFGoodrich KO2 enjoys a sterling reputation, often topping lists for off-road prowess. Forums and reviews laud its toughness and reliability, cementing its status as a benchmark in the all-terrain category.

The Yokohama Geolandar X-AT, though newer to the scene, earns props for its value and on-road manners. Experts appreciate its competitive pricing and durability, with some calling it a sleeper hit for budget-conscious adventurers.

The KO2 might win the popularity contest, but the X-AT is carving out a loyal following among those who prioritize comfort and cost.

Our Observation

So, which tire should you roll with? It boils down to your driving life and priorities.

• Go for the BFGoodrich KO2 if: You’re an off-road warrior who craves top-tier performance in mud, snow, and rocks. Its 50,000-mile warranty and rugged build justify the $300 price tag (for 285/70R17) if trails dominate your routes. The trade-off? A slightly noisier ride on pavement.
• Choose the Yokohama Geolandar X-AT if: You want a versatile tire that leans toward on-road comfort without breaking the bank. At around $250 per tire, it offers a 45,000–50,000-mile warranty (depending on size) and shines for daily driving with occasional off-road fun. It’s less dominant in extreme conditions but delivers where it counts for most.
• The Middle Ground: If your driving splits evenly between pavement and dirt, the X-AT’s lower cost and quieter ride might tip the scales, though the KO2’s off-road edge could sway you if rugged trips are frequent.

Both tires are winners in their own right—the KO2 for its off-road legacy, the X-AT for its value and refinement. Picture your next drive: Is it a dusty trail or a smooth highway? Your answer will steer you to the right choice.

• Yokohama Avid Ascend Lx vs Michelin Defender 2